Diagnostic value of serum biomarkers FGF21 and GDF15 compared to muscle sample in mitochondrial disease

PURPOSE: To compare the value of serum biomarkers, FGF21 and GDF15 with histological analysis of muscle in the diagnosis of mitochondrial disease. METHODS: We collected 194 serum samples from patients with a suspected or known mitochondrial disease. Biomarkers were analyzed blinded using enzyme labelled immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Clinical data was collected using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Only 39% of patients with genetically verified mitochondrial disease had mitochondrial pathology in their muscle histology. In contrast, biomarkers were elevated in 62% of patients with genetically verified mitochondrial disease. Those with both biomarkers elevated had a muscle manifesting disorder and a defect affecting mitochondrial DNA expression. If at least one of the biomarkers was induced and the patient had a myopathic disease, a mitochondrial DNA expression disease was the cause with 94% probability. Among patients with biomarker analysis and muscle biopsy taken <12 months apart, a mitochondrial disorder would have been identified in 70% with analysis of FGF21 and GDF15 compared to 50% of patients whom could have been identified with muscle biopsy alone. Muscle findings were non-diagnostic in 72% (children) and 45% (adults). CONCLUSION: Induction of FGF21 and GDF15 suggest a mitochondrial etiology as an underlying cause of a muscle manifesting disease. Normal biomarker values do not, however, rule out a mitochondrial disorder, especially if the disease does not manifest in muscle. We suggest that FGF21 and GDF15 together should be first-line diagnostic investigations in mitochondrial disease complementing muscle biopsy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.