Development and Validation of a Five Factor Score for Prediction of Pathologic Pneumatosis.

2020
BACKGROUND The significance of pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) remains challenging. While certain clinical scenarios are predictive of transmural ischemia, risk models to assess the presence of pathologic PI are needed. The aim of this study was to determine what patient factors at time of radiographic diagnosis of PI predict risk for pathologic PI. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients with PI from 2010 to 2016 at a multicenter hospital network. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a predictive model for pathologic PI in a derivation cohort. Using regression-coefficient-based methods, the final multivariate model was converted into a five-factor-based score. Calibration and discrimination of the score were then assessed in a validation cohort. RESULTS Of 305 patients analyzed, 102 had pathologic PI (33.4%). We identified five factors associated with pathologic PI at time of radiographic diagnosis: small bowel PI, age > 70 years, heart rate > 110 bpm, lactate > 2 mmol/L, and neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio > 10. Using this model, patients in the validation cohort were assigned risk scores ranging from 0-11. Low risk patients were categorized as scores 0-4, intermediate 5-6, high 7-8, and very high-risk 9+. In the validation cohort, very high-risk patients (n=17; 18.1%) had predicted rates of pathologic pneumatosis of 88.9% and an observed rate of 82.4%. In contrast, patients labeled as low risk (n=37; 39.4%) had expected rates of pathologic pneumatosis of 1.3% and an observed rate of 0%. The model showed excellent discrimination (AUC 0.90) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS Our score accurately stratifies patient risk of pathologic pneumatosis. This score has the potential to target high risk individuals for expedient operation and spare low risk individuals invasive interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, Prognostic and Epidemiological Study.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    28
    References
    2
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []
    Baidu
    map