Characterizing diversity of food systems in view of sustainability transitions. A review
2019
Dominant
food systemsare configured from the productivist paradigm, which focuses on producing large amounts of inexpensive and standardized foods. Although these
food systemscontinue being supported worldwide, they are no longer considered fit-for-purpose as they have been proven unsustainable in environmental and social terms. A large body of scientific literature argues that a transition from the dominant
food systemsto alternative ones built around the wider principles of
sustainable productionand rural development is needed. Promoting such a sustainability transition would benefit from a diagnosis of
food systemtypes to identify those systems that may harbor promising characteristics for a transition to sustainable
food systems. While research on
food systemtransitions abounds, an operational approach to characterize the diversity of
food systemstaking a system perspective is still lacking. In this paper we review the literature on how transitions to sustainable
food systemsmay play out and present a framework based on the Multi-Level Perspective on Socio-Technical Transitions, which builds upon conceptual developments from social and natural science disciplines. The objectives of the framework are to (i) characterize the diversity of existing
food systemsat a certain geographical scale based on a set of structural characteristics and (ii) classify the
food systemsin terms of their support by mainstream practices, i.e., dominant
food systemsconnected to regimes; deviate radically from them, niche
food systemssuch as those based on grassroots innovation; or share elements of dominant and niche
food systems, i.e., hybrid
food systems. An example is given of application of our framework to vegetable
food systemswith a focus on production, distribution, and consumption of low-or-no pesticide vegetables in Chile. Drawing on this illustrative example we reflect on usefulness, shortcomings, and further development and use of the diagnostic framework.
Keywords:
-
Correction
-
Source
-
Cite
-
Save
116
References
57
Citations
NaN
KQI