Hydrogen permeation and distribution at a high-strength X80 steel weld under stressing conditions and the implication on pipeline failure

Abstract Hydrogen permeation and distribution at pipeline welds is critical to integrity maintenance of the pipelines, especially for those made of high-strength steels. The situation becomes even more important under stressing conditions. In this work, metallographic characterization and micro-hardness measurements were conducted at an X80 steel weld. Potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical hydrogen permeation testing were performance at various zones at the weld, along with numerical modeling of hydrogen distribution at the zones. The X80 steel contains a microstructure of bainite bundles and polygonal ferrite. There are more polygonal ferrite, fewer bainite and some segregated cementite at heat-affected zone (HAZ). The weld metal is featured with acicular ferrite and some grain boundary ferrite. HAZ softening occurs at the weld. The hardness of the weld metal, HAZ and base steel is about 290, 248 and 261 HV0.2, respectively. There is the greatest corrosion current density, i.e., corrosion rate, at HAZ under both elastic and plastic stresses. An applied stress further increases the corrosion current density. Under the plastic stress of 1.1σys (σys is yield strength), the corrosion current densities of HAZ, base steel and weld metal are 41.04, 17.03 and 25.49 μA/cm2, respectively. There are always the greatest hydrogen trapping density and the smallest hydrogen diffusivity at HAZ. Hydrogen, once penetrating the welded steel, tends to accumulate at the HAZ, compared with other two zones. When the welded steel is under stresses, especially a plastic stress (i.e., 1.1σys), the hydrogen diffusivity and permeability decrease, while the subsurface hydrogen concentration and hydrogen trapping density increase remarkably. Plastic deformation favors the hydrogen permeation and trapping at weld, especially the HAZ, to elevate the susceptibility to hydrogen damage. The hydrogen distribution at different welding zones can be evaluated and determined by a developed modeling method.