Left-ventricular non-compaction-comparison between different techniques of quantification of trabeculations: Should the diagnostic thresholds be modified?

2020 
Summary Background Diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is challenging, and different imaging techniques propose different criteria. Aim To compare the value of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) criteria in diagnosing LVNC, and to test a new trabecular quantification method obtained by 2D-TTE, exploring its relationship with CMR non-compacted mass quantification. Methods From a multicentre French study, we selected 48 patients with LVNC and 20 with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) who underwent 2D-TTE and CMR. Current 2D-TTE (Jenni et al.) and CMR criteria (Petersen et al., Jacquier et al.), were tested. A new 2D-TTE method of trabecular quantification (percentage of trabecular area) was also proposed, and compared with current criteria. Results The best cut-off values for the diagnosis of LVNC were a non-compacted/compacted ratio ≥ 2.3 (Petersen et al.), a trabeculated left ventricular mass ≥ 20% (Jacquier et al.) and a non-compacted/compacted ratio ≥ 1.8 (Jenni et al.). Lowering the threshold for the criterion of Jenni et al. from > 2 to ≥ 1.8 improved its sensitivity from 69% to 98%. The 2D-TTE percentage of trabecular area was 25.9 ± 8% in the LVNC group vs. 9.9 ± 4.4% in the DCM group (P  Conclusions Revision of the current threshold for the criterion of Jenni et al. from > 2 to ≥ 1.8 is necessary to improve LVNC diagnosis in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. A new 2D-TTE trabecular quantification method improves TTE diagnosis of LVNC.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    29
    References
    0
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []
    Baidu
    map