A Japanese multi‐institutional collaborative study of antigen‐positive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in patients with corresponding RBC antibodies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is sometimes difficult to obtain antigen-negative red blood cells (RBCs) for patients with antibodies against RBCs. However, the frequency and severity of the adverse reactions have not been well elucidated. Here, we conducted a multi-institutional collaborative study to clarify the background, frequency and clinical significance of antigen-positive RBC transfusions to patients with the respective antibodies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey included the background of patients, antigens on RBCs transfused, total amount of antigen-positive RBCs transfused, results from antibody screen and direct antiglobulin tests, specificity of antibodies, adverse reactions and efficacies. All antibodies were surveyed regardless of their clinical significance. RESULTS: In all, 826 cases containing 878 antibodies were registered from 45 institutions. The main reasons for antigen-positive RBC transfusions included 'negative by indirect antiglobulin test' (39%) and 'detection of warm autoantibodies' (25%). In 23 cases (3% of total), some adverse reactions were observed after antigen-positive RBC transfusion, and 25 antibodies (9 of 119 clinically significant and 16 of 646 insignificant antibodies) were detected. Non-specific warm autoantibodies were detected in 9 cases, anti-E in 5 cases, 2 cases each of anti-Le(a) , anti-Jr(a) or cold alloantibodies, and 1 case each of anti-Di(b) , anti-Le(b) or anti-P1. Other antibodies were detected in 2 further cases. Five (22%) of these 23 cases, who had anti-E (3 cases) or anti-Jr(a) (2 cases), experienced clinically apparent haemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse reactions, especially haemolysis, were more frequently observed in cases with clinically significant antibodies than those with clinically insignificant antibodies (P < 0.001).