Farmers’ reasoning behind the uptake of agroforestry practices: evidence from multiple case-studies across Europe
2018
Potential benefits and costs of
agroforestrypractices have been analysed by experts, but few studies have captured farmers’ perspectives on why
agroforestrymight be adopted on a European scale. This study provides answers to this question, through an analysis of 183 farmer interviews in 14 case study systems in eight European countries. The study systems included high natural and cultural value
agroforestrysystems, silvoarable systems, high value tree systems, and
silvopasturesystems, as well as systems where no
agroforestrypractices were occurring. A mixed method approach combining quantitative and qualitative approaches was taken throughout the interviews. Narrative thematic data analysis was performed. Data collection proceeded until no new themes emerged. Within a given case study, i.e. the different systems in different European regions, this sampling was performed both for farmers who practice
agroforestryand farmers who did not. Results point to a great diversity of
agroforestrypractices, although many of the farmers are not aware of the term or concept of
agroforestry, despite implementing the practice in their own farms. While only a few farmers mentioned eligibility for
direct paymentsin the CAP as the main reason to remove trees from their land, to avoid the reduction of the funded area, the tradition in the family or the region, learning from others, and increasing the diversification of products play the most important role in adopting or not
agroforestrysystems.
Keywords:
-
Correction
-
Source
-
Cite
-
Save
45
References
25
Citations
NaN
KQI