Export strategy, export intensity and learning: Integrating the resource perspective and institutional perspective
2018
Exportintensity (EI) has been widely examined as a performance outcome of
exportingfirms. To date, studies on the determinants of EI have generated mixed and even contradictory results. To reconcile such inconsistencies, this study dichotomizes
exportstrategy in emerging economies into two distinctive types, expansion-oriented vs. escape-oriented, with the former inspired by exploiting firm-specific competencies as portrayed by the RBV and the latter motivated by avoiding the domestic institutional deficiencies as informed by the institutional perspective. Different from prior findings in the International Business literature, this research finds that a firm’s extremely high EI might not result from their superior competencies. Instead, high EI firms might focus on
exportmainly for the purpose of escaping from their home country’s deficient institutional environment that places extra burdens in terms of costs of doing business. Such escape-oriented
exportersare more sensitive and responsive to changes in the environment while they do not enhance their learning as much as those expansion-oriented
exporters. Furthermore, institutional environment has heterogeneous impacts on firms with different ownership types. Our study helps integrate the insights from both the RBV and the institutional perspective, and our dichotomization of
exportstrategy adds precision and sophistication to the understanding of EI and
export performance. Our hypotheses are supported by an empirical study based on a sample of
exportingfirms in China between 1998 and 2007.
Keywords:
-
Correction
-
Source
-
Cite
-
Save
97
References
22
Citations
NaN
KQI