Counterpoint regarding an alternative hypothesis for why exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treat type 2 diabetes.

Calvin S. Carter,Sunny C. Huang,Charles Searby,Benjamin Cassaidy,Michael Miller,Wojciech J Grzesik,Ted B. Piorczynski,Thomas Pak,Susan A. Walsh,Michael R. Acevedo,Qihong Zhang,Kranti A. Mapuskar,Ginger L. Milne,Antentor O Hinton,Deng-Fu Guo,Robert M. Weiss,Kyle Bradberry,Eric B. Taylor,Adam J. Rauckhorst,David W. Dick,Vamsidhar Akurathi,Kelly C. Falls-Hubert,Brett A. Wagner,Walter Carter,Kai Wang,Andrew W. Norris,Kamal Rahmouni,Garry R. Buettner,Jason M. Hansen,Douglas R. Spitz,E. Dale Abel,Val C. Sheffield

Counterpoint regarding an alternative hypothesis for why exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treat type 2 diabetes.

2021

Petersen et al. hypothesize that vestibular stress underlies the therapeutic effects of static magnetic and electric fields in type 2 diabetes. However, our experimental data directly contradict th...

Keywords:

Counterpoint
Cognitive psychology
Internal medicine
Type 2 diabetes
Electric field
Medicine
Alternative hypothesis

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations