The Clinical Microsystems Approach, Does-It Really Work?

Abstract Objectives Faced with the increased expectations on the quality and safety of health care delivery systems, a number of stakeholders are increasingly looking for more efficient ways to deliver care. This study was conducted in order to provide a critical appraisal and synthesize the best available evidence on the impact of implementing clinical microsystem (CMS) on quality of care and safety of the health care delivery. Data sources A comprehensive and systematic search of six electronic databases, from 1998 to 2018, was conducted to identify empirical literature published in both English and French, evaluating the impact of implementing CMS in healthcare settings. Data extraction Independent reviewers screened abstracts, read full texts, extracted data from the included studies, and appraised methodological quality assessments. Results Of the 1,907 records retrieved, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. The settings included general practice clinics (n=18), specialized care units (n=14), and emergency and ambulatory units (n=3). The implementation of CMS helped to develop the patient-centered approach, to promote interdisciplinarity and quality improvement skills, to increase the fluidity of the clinical acts performed, and to increase patient safety. It contributed to increasing patients' and clinicians' satisfaction, as well as reducing hospital length of stay and reducing hospital-acquired infections. The implementation of CMS also contributed to the development and refinement of diagnostic tools and measurement instruments. Conclusion The CMS is unique, because of the primacy given to the quality of care offered and the safety of patients over any other consideration and its ability to redesign the health care delivery systems. Efforts still need to be made to legitimize the approach in various healthcare settings worldwide.