Fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) mitogenomics: A cautionary tale of defining sub-species from mitochondrial sequence monophyly
2019
Abstract The advent of
massive parallel sequencingtechnologies has resulted in an increase of studies based upon complete mitochondrial
genome DNAsequences that revisit the taxonomic status within and among species. Spatially distinct
monophylyin such mitogenomic genealogies, i.e., the sharing of a recent common ancestor among con-specific samples collected in the same region has been viewed as evidence for
subspecies. Several recent studies in cetaceans have employed this criterion to suggest subsequent intraspecific taxonomic revisions. We reason that employing intra-specific, spatially distinct
monophylyat non-recombining, clonally inherited genomes is an unsatisfactory criterion for defining
subspeciesbased upon theoretical (
genetic drift) and practical (sampling effort) arguments. This point was illustrated by a re-analysis of a global mitogenomic assessment of fin
whales,
Balaenopteraphysalus spp., published by Archer et al. (2013), which proposed to further subdivide the Northern Hemisphere fin
whale
subspecies, B. p. physalus . The proposed revision was based upon the detection of spatially distinct
monophylyamong North Atlantic and North Pacific fin
whalesin a genealogy based upon complete mitochondrial
genome DNAsequences. The extended analysis conducted in this study (1676 mitochondrial control region, 162 complete mitochondrial
genome DNAsequences and 20 microsatellite loci genotyped in 380 samples) revealed that the apparent
monophylyamong North Atlantic fin
whalesreported by Archer et al. (2013) to be due to low sample sizes. In conclusion, defining sub-species from
monophyly(i.e., the absence of para- or
polyphyly) can lead to erroneous conclusions due to relatively “trivial” aspects, such as sampling. Basic population genetic processes (i.e.,
genetic driftand migration) also affect the time to the
most recent common ancestorand hence the probability that individuals in a sample are monophyletic.
Keywords:
-
Correction
-
Source
-
Cite
-
Save
72
References
3
Citations
NaN
KQI