Initiating or changing to a fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate/formoterol over fluticasone propionate/salmeterol : a real-life effectiveness and cost impact evaluation
2017
Abstract Objective Asthma has a substantial impact on quality of life and health care resources. The identification of a more cost-effective, yet equally efficacious, treatment could positively influence the economic burden of this disease.
Fluticasone propionate/
Formoterol(
FP/FOR) may be as effective as
Fluticasone
Salmeterol(
FP/SAL). We evaluated non-inferiority of asthma control in terms of the proportion of patients free from
exacerbations, and conducted a cost impact analysis. Methods This historical, matched cohort database study evaluated two treatment groups in the Optimum Patient Care Research Database in the UK: 1) an
FP/FOR cohort of patients initiating treatment with
FP/FOR or changing from
FP/SAL to
FP/FOR and; 2) an
FP/SAL cohort comprising patients initiating, or remaining on
FP/SAL pMDI combination therapy. The main outcome evaluated non-inferiority of effectiveness (defined as prevention of severe
exacerbations, lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the
mean differencebetween groups in patient proportions with no
exacerbationsis −3.5% or higher) in patients treated with
FP/FOR versus
FP/SAL. Results After matching 1:3, we studied a total of 2472 patients: 618 in the
FP/FOR cohort (174 patients initiated on
FP/FOR and 444 patients changed to
FP/FOR) and 1854 in the
FP/SAL cohort (522 patients initiated
FP/SAL and 1332 continued
FP/SAL). The percentage of patients prescribed
FP/FOR met non-inferiority as the adjusted
mean differencein proportion of no severe
exacerbations(95%CI) was 0.008 (−0.032, 0.047) between the two cohorts. No other significant differences were observed except acute respiratory event rates, which were lower for patients prescribed
FP/FOR (rate ratio [RR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.71, 0.94). Conclusions Changing to, or initiating
FP/FOR combination therapy, is associated with a non-inferior proportion of patients who are severe
exacerbation-free at a lower average annual cost compared with continuing or initiating treatment with
FP/SAL.
Keywords:
-
Correction
-
Source
-
Cite
-
Save
35
References
4
Citations
NaN
KQI