COMPARISON OF TRANSFEMORAL VERSUS TRANSRADIAL SECONDARY ACCESS IN TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Lucia Junquera Vega,Marina Urena,Azeem Latib,Antonio J. Muñoz-García,Luis Nombela-Franco,Benjamin Faurie,Gabriela Veiga Fernandez,Alberto Alperi García,Vicente Serra,Ander Regueiro,Quentin J. Fisher,Dominique Himbert,Antonio Mangieri,Antonio Colombo,Erika Muñoz-García,Rafael Vera Urquiza,Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo,José M. de la Torre Hernández,Isaac Pascual,Bruno García del Blanco,Manel Sabaté,Siamak Mohammadi,Afonso B. Freitas-Ferraz,Leonardo Guimarães,Josep Rodes–Cabau

COMPARISON OF TRANSFEMORAL VERSUS TRANSRADIAL SECONDARY ACCESS IN TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

2020

Vascular complications (VC) remain one of the most important drawbacks of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Transfemoral (TF) approach has been commonly used as secondary access in TAVR, and preliminary data suggested that up to 25% of TAVR VC are related to the TF secondary access.

Keywords:

Diabetes mellitus
Medicine
Cardiology
Aortic valve replacement
Internal medicine
transcatheter aortic
Valve replacement

Correction
Source
Cite
Save

References

Citations