The interactions between chiral analytes and chitosan-based chiral stationary phases during enantioseparation

Abstract The goal of the present study was to disclose the interactions between chitosan-type chiral stationary phases (CSPs) and chiral analytes during enantioseparation. Hence, six chitosan bis(phenylcarbamate)-(cyclohexylmethylurea)s were synthesized and characterized. These chitosan derivatives were employed as chiral selectors (CSs) with which the corresponding coated-type CSPs were prepared. According to the nature and position of the substituents on the phenyl group, the CSs and CSPs were divided into three sets. The counterparts of the three sets were 3,5-diMe versus 3,5-diCl, 4-Me versus 4-Cl and 3-Me versus 3-Cl. The enantioseparation capability of the CSPs was evaluated with high-performance liquid chromatography. The CSPs demonstrated a good enantioseparation capability to the tested chiral analytes. In enantioselectivity, the CSs with 3,5-diCl and with 4-Me roughly were better than the counterparts with 3,5-diMe and with 4-Cl respectively. The CS with 3-Me enantiomerically recognized more analytes than the one with 3-Cl, but showed lower separation factors in more enantioseparations. The acidity of the amide hydrogen in the phenylcarbamates was investigated with density functional theory calculations and 1H NMR measurements. The trend of the acidity variation with different substituents on the phenyl group was confirmed by the retention factors of acetone on the CSPs. Compared the retention factors of analytes on every set of the counterparts, the formation of hydrogen bond (HB) in enantioseparation could be outlined as follows: when the CSs interacted with chiral analytes without reactive hydrogen but with lone paired electrons, the carbamate N‒Hs in the CSs were HB donors and the analytes were HB acceptors; if the CSs interacted with analytes with a reactive hydrogen, the role of the CSs in HB formation was related to the acidity of the reactive hydrogen; the patterns of HB formation between the CSs and analytes were also impacted by compositions of mobile phases, in addition to the nature, number and position of substituents on the phenyl group. Based on the discussions, chiral recognition mechanism could be understood in more detail. Besides, the strategy to improve enantioseparation capability of a CSP by introducing a substituent onto phenyl group was clarified and further comprehended.