Shoreline Hardening Affects Nekton Biomass, Size Structure, and Taxonomic Diversity in Nearshore Waters, with Responses Mediated by Functional Species Groups
2018
Coastal shoreline
hardeningis intensifying due to human population growth and sea level rise. Prior studies have emphasized shoreline-
hardeningeffects on faunal abundance and diversity; few have examined effects on faunal biomass and size structure or described effects specific to different functional groups. We evaluated the biomass and size structure of mobile fish and
crustaceanassemblages within two
nearshorezones (waters extending 3 and 16 m from
shore) adjacent to natural (native wetland; beach) and
hardened(bulkhead;
riprap) shorelines. Within 3 m from
shore, the total fish/
crustaceanbiomass was greatest at
hardenedshorelines, driven by greater water depth that facilitated access to
planktivore(e.g., bay
anchovy) and benthivore-
piscivore(e.g., white perch) species. Small-bodied littoral-demersal species (e.g.,
Fundulusspp.) had greatest biomass at wetlands. By contrast, total biomass was comparable among shoreline types within 16 m from
shore, suggesting the effect of shoreline
hardeningon fish biomass is largely within extreme
nearshoreareas immediately at the land/water interface. Shoreline type utilization was mediated by body size across all functional groups: small individuals (≤60 mm) were most abundant at wetlands and beaches, while large individuals (>100 mm) were most abundant at
hardenedshorelines. Taxonomic diversity analysis indicated natural shoreline types had more diverse assemblages, especially within 3 m from
shore, although relationships with shoreline type were weak and sensitive to the inclusion/exclusion of
crustaceans. Our study illustrates how shoreline
hardeningeffects on fish/
crustaceanassemblages are mediated by functional group, body size, and distance from
shore, with important applications for management.
Keywords:
-
Correction
-
Source
-
Cite
-
Save
87
References
7
Citations
NaN
KQI