Identification of a Novel Protein-Based Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma

Background Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common types of malignant adult kidney cancer, and its incidence and mortality are not optimistic. It is well known that tumor-related protein markers play an important role in cancer detection, prognosis prediction, or treatment selection, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), so a comprehensive analysis was performed in this study to explore the prognostic value of protein expression in patients with ccRCC. Materials and Methods Protein expression data were obtained from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA), and clinical information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We selected 445 patients with complete information and then separated them into a training set and testing set. We performed univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox analyses to find prognosis-related proteins (PRPs) and constructed a protein signature. Then, we used stratified analysis to fully verify the prognostic significance of the prognostic-related protein signature score (PRPscore). Besides, we also explored the differences in immunotherapy response and immune cell infiltration level in high and low score groups. The consensus clustering analysis was also performed to identify potential cancer subgroups. Results From the training set, a total of 233 PRPs were selected, and a seven-protein signature was constructed, including ACC1, AR, MAPK, PDK1, PEA15, SYK, and BRAF. Based on the PRPscore, patients could be divided into two groups with significantly different overall survival rates. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses proved that this signature was an independent prognostic factor for patients (P < 0.001). Moreover, the signature showed a high ability to distinguish prognostic outcomes among subgroups, and the low score group had a better prognosis (P < 0.001) and better immunotherapy response (P = 0.003) than the high score group. Conclusion We constructed a novel protein signature with robust predictive power and high clinical value. This will help to guide the disease management and individualized treatment of ccRCC patients.