Biofilm-specific uptake does not explain differences in whole-stream DOC tracer uptake between a forest and an agricultural stream
2019
Benthic
biofilmsare often assumed to control terrestrially-derived
dissolved organic carbon(tDOC) uptake in
streams. We tested this by comparing 13C-enriched ryegrass leachate uptake in an agricultural and a forest
stream, hypothesizing that a greater abundance of autotrophic
biofilmsin the agricultural
streamwould cause its whole-
streamtDOC uptake to be comparatively low. We measured whole-
streamand
biofilmtDOC tracer uptake, metabolism, bacterial and algal diversity, and nutrient status of benthic epilithic
biofilms, and assessed whole-
streamhydromorphology. Whole-
streamuptake of tDOC was six times lower in the agricultural (3.0 mg m−2 day−1) than in the forest (19.0 mg m−2 day−1)
stream, and tDOC uptake velocity indicated lower tDOC demand in the agricultural (1.2 mm min−1) than in the forest (1.9 mm min−1)
stream. The agricultural
streamdiffered from the forest
streamby slightly lower transient storage capacity and higher benthic
biofilmbacterial abundance and production, lower
biofilmbiomass and lower
biofilmmolar C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios. Changes in epilithic
biofilmscontributed little to the differences in whole-
streamtDOC tracer uptake between
streams, as
biofilmtDOC uptake only amounted to 4% and 13% of whole-
streamuptake in the forest and agricultural
stream, respectively. This comparison of a forest and an agricultural
streamsuggests that agricultural stressors have the potential to diminish both whole-
streamtDOC uptake and uptake efficiency. Furthermore, the weak link between
biofilmand whole-
streamtDOC uptake implies that benthic
biofilmscharacteristics are poor predictors for human impacts on tDOC uptake in agricultural
streamsand that hot spots of tDOC uptake are likely situated in the
hyporheic zoneor in the
streamwater column.
Keywords:
-
Correction
-
Source
-
Cite
-
Save
63
References
5
Citations
NaN
KQI