Decision-making dilemmas of paediatricians: a qualitative study in Japan

Objective To delineate the critical decision-making processes that paediatricians apply when treating children with life-threatening conditions and the psychosocial experience of paediatricians involved in such care. Design We conducted semistructured, individual face-to-face interviews for each participant from 2014 to 2015. The content of each interview was subjected to a comprehensive qualitative analysis. The categories of dilemmawere extracted from a second-round content analysis. Participants Participants were board-certified paediatricians with sufficient experience in making decisions in relation to children with severe illnesses or disabilities. We repeated purposive sampling and analyses until we reached saturation of the category data. Results We performed interviews with 15 paediatricians. They each reported both unique and overlapping categories of dilemmasthat they encountered when making critical decisions. The dilemmasincluded five types of causal elements: (1) paediatricians’ convictions; (2) the quest for the best interestsof patients; (3) the quest for medically appropriate plans; (4) confronting parents and families and (5) socioenvironmental issues. Dilemmasoccurred and developed as conflicting interactions among these five elements. We further categorised these five elements into three principal domains: the decision-maker (decider); consensus making among families, colleagues and society (process) and the consequential output of the decision (consequence). Conclusions This is the first qualitative study to demonstrate the framework of paediatricians’ decision-making processes and the complex structures of dilemmasthey face. Our data indicate the necessity of establishing and implementing an effective support system for paediatricians, such as structured professional education and arguments for creating social consensus that assist them to reach the best plan for the management of severely ill children.